Jim, I apologise that my mail seemed to have re-ignited the unfortunate series of mails. It was not intended to do so.
I do have a considerable interest in the way the program is developed and where the resources are spent - for instance (and I'm probably opening another can of worms here) I'm not convinced that 'witnesses' need further development; for my purposes the notes section seems admirably suited - as they are for many other bits of 'non-gen' information I want/need to record. I'm also well aware that Legacy currently is NOT a pure Genealogy Program; nor would I wish it to be one since I use 'non-gen' facets myself. However I do believe it's development resources should lean towards the 'gen' side in developing the output. I'm more than happy with the program as it is. I'd like some other things (who wouldn't). What I don't want is a program with a significantly large number of, to me, non-necessary bells and whistles with a consequent overhead in machine load and cost. I had hoped to stimulate a rational discussion over where we, as a user community, thought development of Legacy should go (Geoff will make the final decisions!), but obviously some folk are not rational. Again, apologies. Bill Anderson Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
