Not quite... while both sets of children from the previous marriages
will be half siblings of the issue of the second marriage they will not
be related by blood to each other.
-----Original Message-----
From: marilyn E B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 8:39 am
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Re: Legacy: Family History or Genealogy? -TH
While I am not an authority on genealogy or Legacy, unless you are
only doing a direct line of descent or ascent, there would come a
point where some step children would be
blood relatives.
A couple who marries, each having children from previous marriages,
and then have children of their own, may not have a blood relationship
to the other's previous children; but all these children will have a
blood relationship to each other. Now who would you omit?
I do enjoy reading all the helps and hints from those who have so much
experience and save about 95% of the messages on this list.
Marilyn
On 9/7/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just one quibble with the first sentence... blood relationships do
*not* include step; that is a social relationship having nothing to do
with blood.
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
________________________________________________________________________
Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- Unlimited storage and
industry-leading spam and email virus protection.
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
