So what, there would never be any adopted child in the family of the heir to
the crown.
So your total unrealistic point, isn't such a good point regarding how to
treat adopted
children as any adopted child in Norway would legally be treated like any
families
biological children. You may say that the heir to the Crown is disciminated
againts as he/she could never
adopt a child, and if he/she had a child outside marriage that child would
never be able to inherit the
crown either.
Theretically you're right, but realistically all adopted children are
treated like biological
children would.
Anne
----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 5:26 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Adopted Daughter unmarried mother
Easy- No adoptee can ever inherit the crown. If that isn't treating
adoptees different from biological children I don't know what is.
-----Original Message-----
From: Anne Hildrum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Thu, 20 Sep 2007 8:57 am
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Adopted Daughter unmarried mother
I as a Norwegian would like to know how the Norwegian law treat
adoptive children different than others within their adoptive family.
Anne
----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2007 2:30 AM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Adopted Daughter unmarried mother
> This is an over generalization that is simply not true. I can name off
> the top of my head 10 western european countries
that, > by law, require adoptees be treated differently than others
within > their adoptive families.
> Norway, Sweden, Denmark, Spain, England, Luxemburg, Leichenstein,
The > Netherlands, Belgium, and Monaco.
> -----Original Message-----
From: Sara Binkley Tarpley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Sent: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 12:29 pm
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Adopted Daughter unmarried mother
> > > I am somewhat reluctant to post on this again as I fear it may
be
getting off topic. Let me begin by saying if the law thinks that the terms
"mother," "father," "parent," "son," "daughter," and "child"
are
adequate to cover adoptive relationships, why is there a problem
using
them in genealogy for such relationships? When a child is adopted, the law
makes absolutely no, let me repeat , no difference between that child and
a biological child, even to the point of issuing a new birth certificate.
> >
________________________________________________________________________
Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- Unlimited storage and >
industry-leading spam and email virus protection.
> > > Legacy User Group guidelines: >
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: >
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To
unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
>
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
________________________________________________________________________
Check Out the new free AIM(R) Mail -- Unlimited storage and
industry-leading spam and email virus protection.
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
