I break census data down, so that the main different census fields I have are:

Event/Fact: Living
       Description: in, with, or near and names of people involved
           Date: Census year
               Location: Twp/PO, Co, State
Event/Fact:: Also living in household:
Descr: relation to head, name, age, (if a servant or other I also include color and occupation). I don't include sex unless it's not apparent from the given name)
Event/Fact::Education:
Descr: literacy/illiteracy matters; whether attended school during year, etc.:
Event/Fact::Occupation:
           Descr: whatever info is available in the census
Event/Fact::Property:
Descr: (depending on what's available from census) any of the following: Real & value, personal & value; slaves (sad to say) and sex, age, mulattor or black for each; whether owned or rented farm and/or house, value of house, wheher owned radio.

Of course I also enter birth info from the census in the birth field and any marriage or death info that I can surmise into the respective fields. A man's name disappears and his wife's appears as head as of household, and she's said to be a widow. If I already had the exact date of death I wouldn't bother wuth this.

(The most interesting occupation I've come across was for a woman (widow) c1870 who gave her occupation as "capitalist"!)

I like breaking the census info down because then it's easy to compare the status from one decade to the next. And I like to know who's living with whom or near whom.

I think I don't include as many neighbors as genealogists advise, just because it's too time-consuming. Though I do save copies of all pages from which I take info -- but I don't include the next page for example.

Of course I don't do this detail for everybody. Just closer relatives or those who for some reason intrigue me. But I try to be as inclusive as time permits. For example if I had a distant relative who owned a lot of slaves, I wouldn't list them individually but I'd group them in some way -- whatever was most reveaing or provocative about the nature of his slaveholding practices. (I did my thesis on opposition to slavery in Virginia from 1831-1861 so I have a special interest in the whole issue.)

Pat

----- Original Message ----- From: "JLB" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 8:23 PM
Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Residence (not address) as an Event?


The way I enter census data is to make the Event says 'Census', then the date and location in the Description/Place/Notes field. You don't have to have Events print out as sentences. You can also have them as a list in point form. I believe printing a Location report involves the locations as they exist in the Master Location list. Since all the locations entered in your database, in any appropriate location fields, are in there, it would automatically print them. If you put the location of the census in the Desc/Places/Notes field, it will be included in your Location Report.

JLB
http://www3.telus.net/Jgen/

Barbara Ford wrote:
Thanks--there are probably 100 or so records I would have to change, but,
frankly, I'm fast. You're right about the wording being strange...I think I
know how to make it read better. As is, if I have a three-year-old in a
certain township, the report reads "He owned a residence at..."
The only reason I could think of to change them all would be for something I
might want to do with the Location field--for example, if I want to print
the locations at the end of a report, it would pull all those "residence"
locations, too, wouldn't it? That could be good or bad, I guess....

I'm thinking I will go ahead and change all (I'm making a big deal out of
this, because I'm trying to understand/clean up all the records that came in
from FTM when I imported, and hope I am confident on how to enter data
before I add any new records), and then try to change the wording.

Thanks,
Barbara

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ronald
ferguson
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 6:44 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Residence (not address) as an Event?


Barbara,

There is nothing really wrong with that arrangement, although you may have to change the sentence wording for it to read properly (having changed it on
mine I'm not sure what the default wording is!).

My own arrangement is:

Name: Residence
Description: census
Date: eg 1881
Location: Full Address

Details of the census are contained in the Source.

I don't know how many records you have but if it is quite a lot I'd be
sorely tempted to leave it providing it can be made to read OK.

Ron Ferguson


_____________________________________________________________________

For Genealogy, Software and Social visit:
http://www.fergys.co.uk
*New Blog* Protect Your PC
View the Grimshaw Family Tree at:
http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/
For The Fergusons of N.W. England See:
http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/
_____________________________________________________________________


From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [email protected]
Subject: [LegacyUG] Residence (not address) as an Event?
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 18:27:38 -0600

In Family Tree Maker, I used the Residence event as the place where I recorded census information. It came into Legacy like this: For example, I might have an event named Residence, and in the description it might say Hickory Township, Carroll County, Arkansas, USA. The date would be the year of the census, say 1850. The Location field is blank.

Should I have a different procedure--is that where the census information goes, or should I put it somewhere else? If I leave Residence as an Event, should I delete what is now in Description and put it in the Location field of the event?

Thanks,

Barbara




_________________________________________________________________
Get free emoticon packs and customisation from Windows Live. http://www.pimpmylive.co.uk


Give Legacy as a Gift for 25% Off. Visit http://tinyurl.com/2b49et

Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.13/1165 - Release Date: 12/2/2007
8:34 PM

No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.16.13/1165 - Release Date: 12/2/2007
8:34 PM




Give Legacy as a Gift for 25% Off. Visit http://tinyurl.com/2b49et

Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp










Give Legacy as a Gift for 25% Off. Visit http://tinyurl.com/2b49et

Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp








Give Legacy as a Gift for 25% Off. Visit http://tinyurl.com/2b49et

Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Reply via email to