I am most interested in an answer to this same question, Penny. Right now, I can only create a citation that conforms with EE by splitting. It is more efficient to be able to lump a bit more. I have an idea (not based on any inside knowledge) that the new sourcing will allow more lumping, while still being able to create fully compliant sources.
This is really important. I have been holding off on certain kinds of clean-up that my sourcing requires, because I don't want to get the new version and find out that I have to do it all over again, under the new system. Janis Gilmore -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Penny Sent: Saturday, April 05, 2008 1:23 PM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sources and the elusive version 7 .... again. Thanks for your reply, Elizabeth. But, of course, that's the point: I **do** want both the sources I enter now in v6 and the ones I'll enter in v7 to be formatted identically. Sorry, if I wasn't clear enough earlier. I was not talking about "conformity" to the standard of what all should be included, but conformity of format (including my desired level of lumping/splitting) of my own various sources. Let me put it this way: While the "standard" for information which should be included in sources and citing them has remained static over the years, different genealogy programs (or versions thereof) oftentimes require very different approaches in order to achieve/maintain conformity across one's own database (even when one attempts to include all the information required by the standard). Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
