Kris: I can't detail the reasons for the differences you mention, but only to say this: I have both _Evidence!_ and _Evidence Explained_. In comparing the two at the outset, I found so many differences that I finally put away the earlier version and just go by the later one. I would expect that what you're seeing just follows the later version rather than being anything that you're doing wrong.
Kirsten -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Kris Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 12:16 AM To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com Subject: [LegacyUG] Source Writer It's my understanding that Source Writer is designed to format source citations according to "Evidence Explained" -- which I don't have. I have "Evidence!" from 1997. I didn't think there would be much difference, but so far there is. Since no one's complained til now, I figure I must have done something wrong. Example of a death certificate cite from the 1997 book: Floyd Finley Shown, death certificate no. 59-0224 (1959), Tennessee Department of Public Health, Nashville. Cite with Source Writer: Tennessee Department of Public Health, death certificate 59-0224 (1959), Floyd Finley Shown; Tennessee Department of Public Health, Nashville. I haven't found a source yet that's cited the way I would expect. Is the 1997 book just plain obsolete? Am I missing something obvious? I know I can keep doing things the way I was "BS" (before Seven), but I was really looking forward to using the Source Writer. Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
