That is only one of three different ways your source is used.
I like this new way better... it's more in line with the way colleges are
requiring students to document sources now.
Allen
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Kris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 06, 2008 3:15 AM
To: <LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com>
Subject: [LegacyUG] Source Writer
It's my understanding that Source Writer is designed to format source
citations according to "Evidence Explained" -- which I don't have. I
have "Evidence!" from 1997. I didn't think there would be much
difference, but so far there is. Since no one's complained til now, I
figure I must have done something wrong.
Example of a death certificate cite from the 1997 book:
Floyd Finley Shown, death certificate no. 59-0224 (1959), Tennessee
Department of Public Health, Nashville.
Cite with Source Writer:
Tennessee Department of Public Health, death certificate 59-0224 (1959),
Floyd Finley Shown; Tennessee Department of Public Health, Nashville.
I haven't found a source yet that's cited the way I would expect. Is
the 1997 book just plain obsolete? Am I missing something obvious? I
know I can keep doing things the way I was "BS" (before Seven), but I
was really looking forward to using the Source Writer.
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
