Thar's rite there mate!
Ron Ferguson _____________________________________________________________________ New Blog: Free Contacts Database for use with Open Office http://www.fergys.co.uk View the Grimshaw Family Tree at: http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/ For The Fergusons of N.W. England See: http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/ _____________________________________________________________________ > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Non-US Censuses in v7 > Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 15:53:47 +0100 > > Ron > > I thought Mrs Mills was an authority - on the honky-tonk piano! But this one > must be from Yorkshire EE Bah Gum. > > She obviously knew little about UK censuses as she apparently has templates > for both England and Wales - they were identical and part of the same > census. But I didn't see mention of Scotland, Ireland, Channel Islands etc. > How many Australian censuses have survived - I thought they were all > deliberately destroyed as part of privacy rules. > > As you say - let's just leave our American friends to their (expensive) > book > > Jack > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of ronald > ferguson > Sent: 09 June 2008 14:40 > To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Non-US Censuses in v7 > > > Kirsten, > > With no disrespect to Mrs Mills, she is not regarded as an authority over > here. Nevertheless it will be interesting to see how she interprets our > individualistic/historic way of working. > > > Ron Ferguson > > _____________________________________________________________________ > > New Blog: Free Contacts Database for use with Open Office > http://www.fergys.co.uk > View the Grimshaw Family Tree at: > http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/ > For The Fergusons of N.W. England See: > http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/ > _____________________________________________________________________ > > > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com >> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Non-US Censuses in v7 >> Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 12:25:17 -0700 >> >> Ron and Jenny: >> >> Mills' book does cover census formats for Australia, Canada, England, >> France, Germany, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Wales. I suspect that there just >> wasn't time to develop templates for all of these without further delaying >> the release date, but that we could hope for future additions in Legacy. >> >> Kirsten >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of ronald >> ferguson >> Sent: Saturday, June 07, 2008 4:12 AM >> To: legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com >> Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Non-US Censuses in v7 >> >> >> >> Jenny, >> >> Notwithstanding the "Goddess of Sourcing" I am carrying on as before. But >> then I never thought her alledged "standards" would fit the UK. I think > this >> is one of those times when we just leave our American friends to it. >> >> >> Ron Ferguson >> >> _____________________________________________________________________ >> >> New Blog: Free Contacts Database for use with Open Office >> http://www.fergys.co.uk >> View the Grimshaw Family Tree at: >> http://www.fergys.co.uk/Grimshaw/ >> For The Fergusons of N.W. England See: >> http://myweb.tiscali.co.uk/fergys/ >> _____________________________________________________________________ >> >> >> >>> Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 15:17:17 +0100 >>> To: LegacyUserGroup@LegacyFamilyTree.com >>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> Subject: [LegacyUG] Non-US Censuses in v7 >>> >>> >>> I would be interested to know what people think of the new SourceWriter >>> in relation to non-US Censuses. >>> >>> The vast majority of my Censuses are England and Wales and I don't find >>> the new fields in Source Details match up terribly well with what I want >>> to include. >>> >>> The given fields are as follows: >>> >>> Collection or Database >>> Jurisdiction County >>> Page >>> Dwelling No >>> Family >>> Column >>> >>> Collection or Database seems superfluous and I am happy to ignore it. >>> Jurisdiction County is ok, but what about Civil Parish and/or >>> Registration District and/or Sub-Registration District and/or >>> Enumeration District? Page is good. Rather then Dwelling No or Family, >>> in England and Wales we have a Household Schedule No. This could be >>> entered in one of those fields, but the words "Dwell" and "Fam" are >>> included in the Citation if those fields are used. Column is not >>> relevant. >>> >>> Then there are the Class, Piece and Folio numbers which are very >>> important finding aids for any English or Welsh Census entry. My "old" >>> way of entering Source Details for a Census was to enter, for example, >>> HO107-2489-486-4, which is the full Class-Piece-Folio- Page reference. >>> I am now entering that reference in the Page field, so in the Citation >>> it reads "p HO107-2489-486-4" which I can live with. >>> >>> I was not in the habit of including the County, CP, RD, ED or Household >>> No and I could carry on not doing so, but I wonder what others do, >>> especially now that I see what the Goddess of Sourcing expects! >>> >>> -- >>> Jenny M Benson >>> > _________________________________________________________________ http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/msnnkmgl0010000009ukm/direct/01/ Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
