Ah ... but the other thing is ... If one is more what might be called a family historian type as opposed to what might be called a strict genealogist type, there's no "merely" about said relationship; rather, it is a relationship in all respects. Personally, I'd like my gen program to reflect that so-called family historian perspective when I ask it to do so. :)
----- Original Message ----- From: "Wynthner" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ah.. but here's the thing.... *Any* in-law "relationship" is no genealogical relationship at all-merely a social one or a legal one (if that). ;) ----- Original Message ---- From: Chick Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> OK, then Legacy should return the relationship as nephew-in-law. but it returns "no relationship" which is wrong. Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
