----- Original Message -----
From: "Janis Gilmore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com>
Sent: Saturday, July 05, 2008 8:29 AM
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Census - To split or not to split, that is the
question!
I am a splitter, although I split less with the new Source Writer. I am
truly curious as to why anyone cares how many Master Sources they have? I
frequently see postings to this list from people who say they are lumpers
because they don't want a heavily populated Master Source list.
But you have the same data entered in your program, through the source
detail - it's just less accessible for global access and change.
What am I missing in this? What do you view as the advantage of limiting
the
number of Master Sources?
(Not being critical, plenty of room for varying opinion - just truly
curious.)
Janis
When you have the sources *exteremely* split, each one probably only applies
to one person (or a very few) anyway, so you are not gaining any global
change advantage.
Gary
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
