1894 not a leap year. Not divisible evenly by 4
Melody B wrote:
I don't know if this is a bug or not. I have a date for something or
other that is "29 Feb 1894".
To me, that sure looks like a valid date. 1894 should have been a
leap year.
Unless of course it wasn't. But if not, then I don't know why.
And if the date is correct, then Legacy 7 is having a problem with it
- it flags it as a bad date Every single time.
--
Take care,
Melody
If not now, when?
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
