According to a online perpetual calendar, 1894 was not a leap year. 1892, 1896 etc.. were leap years. Laurel
________________________________ > Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 13:51:39 -0400 > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Subject: [LegacyUG] 29 February 1894 - What's wrong with this date? > > I don't know if this is a bug or not. I have a date for something or other > that is "29 Feb 1894". > > To me, that sure looks like a valid date. 1894 should have been a leap year. > > Unless of course it wasn't. But if not, then I don't know why. > > And if the date is correct, then Legacy 7 is having a problem with it - it > flags it as a bad date Every single time. > > > > -- > Take care, > Melody > If not now, when? > > Legacy User Group guidelines: > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp > Archived messages: > http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ > Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp > To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp _________________________________________________________________ Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
