1894 was not a leap year. 94 is not divisable by 4. Only 1892 or 1896 is.
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Melody B Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2008 12:52 PM To: Legacy User Group Subject: [LegacyUG] 29 February 1894 - What's wrong with this date? I don't know if this is a bug or not. I have a date for something or other that is "29 Feb 1894". To me, that sure looks like a valid date. 1894 should have been a leap year. Unless of course it wasn't. But if not, then I don't know why. And if the date is correct, then Legacy 7 is having a problem with it - it flags it as a bad date Every single time. -- Take care, Melody If not now, when? Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
