Elizabeth et al: I think I am finally getting somewhere. My sources were all SourceWriter. I deleted all sources for Charles, Blanche, and all children for Mother and Father Relationship. I then used a Basic source to source Charles' relationships with his mother and father. When I did this, the "Child-Par Rel." line disappears from underneath Charles and all is well with him. The relationship is sourced correctly on the lines showing his parents' names. However, the wife, Blanche, still has a line called "Child-Par Rel." and the Basic Source I used for Charles is showing up here, though it is not attached to Blanche for Father Rel. or Mother Rel.
Now, I also then went back and deleted this Basic Source from Charles for Father Rel. and Mother Rel. I then put it on Blanche for Father Rel. and Mother Rel. Now my family group sheet looks fine. So it appears to be a problem with SourceWriter and with the husband. Whew! Bug found! Now I will report it to Support. Thanks everyone for all your help! --- On Thu, 8/21/08, Elizabeth Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Elizabeth Richardson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcing Father/Mother Relationship Problem > To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > Date: Thursday, August 21, 2008, 6:18 PM > In a FGS, the parents of both the husband and wife are > shown, when known, > whether or not the relationship is defined and/or sourced. > If it is defined > and sourced, the source shows. When the child/parent > relationship is defined > and sourced, and the person is a child on the FGS, there is > a Child-Par. > Rel. line, the relationship is defined and the source > given. I use the Basic > Source only. > > Elizabeth > researching the descendants of William and Sarah > (Patterson) Thompson > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jennifer Trahan" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com> > Sent: Thursday, August 21, 2008 2:59 PM > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcing Father/Mother Relationship > Problem > > > > Elizabeth, > > > > Yes, you are correct in understanding what I am > saying. Do you have an > > extra line on your family group sheet called > "Child-Par. Rel." under the > > wife's name? This is where I am finding the > problem. In the family group > > sheet with Charles as husband, the line containing > Charles' father's name > > says "Jeremiah Pemberton...(Relationship)" > and correctly sources the > > relationship here. I think this "Child-Par. > Rel." line is only supposed to > > show up on the children and not on the husband and > wife. Please let me > > know if you have this line. Thanks! > > > > Jennifer > > > > > > --- On Thu, 8/21/08, Elizabeth Richardson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > >> From: Elizabeth Richardson > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] Sourcing Father/Mother > Relationship Problem > >> To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com > >> Date: Thursday, August 21, 2008, 2:31 PM > >> If I understand what you are doing: you have > Charles > >> relationship to his > >> parents sourced, but when you choose that option > when he is > >> the parent, you > >> are expecting to see the source of this > relationship in a > >> family group > >> sheet. When I do this, I get the anticipated > result. That > >> is, I have a child > >> whose relationship is biological and have sourced > that > >> information. This > >> relationship with her father, biological, is > stated on her > >> family group > >> record when she is a mother, and it is sourced > correctly. I > >> have 7.0.0.55, > >> so I do not think this is a bug, at least in the > Basic > >> Source system. > >> > >> Elizabeth > >> researching the descendants of William and Sarah > >> (Patterson) Thompson > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Jennifer Trahan" > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> To: <legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com> > >> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 5:50 PM > >> Subject: [LegacyUG] Sourcing Father/Mother > Relationship > >> Problem > >> > >> > >> >I recently began sourcing father and mother > >> relationships since Legacy > >> >gives the option to do so. For example, > Charles > >> Pemberton is shown in the > >> >1860 U.S. Census with his father and mother, > Jeremiah > >> and Susanna > >> >Pemberton. On the assigned sources screen for > Charles, > >> I have Father Rel: > >> >1860 U.S. Census - Michigan, Wayne and the > same thing > >> for Mother Rel. When > >> >I create Charles' family group record > (with him as > >> husband), I go to report > >> >options and select "Child-Parent > >> Relationships" on the Include tab. In the > >> >family group record, a new line for Charles > shows up > >> called "Child-Par > >> >Rel." I would expect to see the 1860 U.S. > Census > >> source referenced here, > >> >but it is not. For Charles' youngest > child, Nellie, > >> on her assigned sources > >> >screen, I have referenced 3 of her marriage > records to > >> Father Rel. and > >> >Mother Rel. These 3 marriage records show up > in the > >> Child-Par. Rel. field > >> >for Charles. They also show up for Nellie > under > >> Child-Par. Rel. They are > >> >supposed to show up > >> > for Nellie in that field, but why are they > showing up > >> for Charles? > >> > Shouldn't this field be for sources > showing > >> Charles' relationship to his > >> > parents and not his children's > relationship to > >> him? > >> > > >> > To confuse matters, for Charles' other > children > >> (Susanna, Dewey, > >> > Whitfield, and Martha), I have sourced their > >> individual marriage records > >> > to Father Rel. and Mother Rel. on their > individual > >> assigned sources > >> > screens. These do NOT show up in Charles' > >> Child-Par Rel. field on the > >> > Family Group Record. I have no idea why > Nellie's > >> randomly shows up > >> > incorrectly and not the other childrens'. > Why > >> don't they all show up > >> > incorrectly? > >> > > >> > And, finally, to confuse matters again, in > the > >> Child-Par. Rel. field for > >> > Charles' wife, Blanche, the 1860 U.S. > Census - > >> Michigan, Wayne for the > >> > household of Jeremiah and Susanna Pemberton > is > >> referenced. However, > >> > Blanche was a child in 1860 and not yet > married to > >> Charles. She did not > >> > live in the household of Charles and his > parents, and > >> neither is this > >> > source accidentally attached to her anywhere > in her > >> assigned sources > >> > screen. > >> > > >> > I have double checked all source citations on > all the > >> individuals' > >> > assigned sources screen to make sure I did > not attach > >> a source > >> > incorrectly. > >> > > >> > Is this a bug of some sort? Has anyone else > had this > >> problem? I did a > >> > check/repair file just to make sure, and the > same > >> problem occurs. I've > >> > also noticed once before on my file ID report > that for > >> father rel. and > >> > mother rel. citations, the wrong name shows > up for a > >> particular file ID. I > >> > think I will quit sourcing father/mother > relationships > >> for now and not > >> > include them in my family group record. > However, I > >> would like to be able > >> > to do so in the future. > >> > > >> > Jennifer Trahan > >> > > > > > Legacy User Group guidelines: > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp > Archived messages: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ > Online technical support: > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp > To unsubscribe: > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
