Kirsten,

That sounds like good advice. I didn't realize I would have to have different 
lists of Master Sources and Locations. That would be awful to manage. And I am 
discovering there are so many options and preferences I could get lost in them. 
I'll stick with one database and when I need to pull out my direct line, I'll 
ask you!  Thanks.

Sherry W.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Kirsten Bowman" <vik...@rvi.net>
To: LegacyUserGroup@legacyfamilytree.com
Sent: Sunday, October 4, 2009 7:27:53 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: RE: [LegacyUG] Different Family Lines

Sherry:

Welcome to Legacy!

I'd definitely recommend keeping the family together in one file.  That way you 
have just one group of settings and preferences to work with as well as one set 
of Master Sources and Locations--not to mention having just one GEDCOM to 
upload and maintain.  It just makes life so much easier.  I have all my data in 
one file with about 8,000 names and roughly 700 sources.  This includes a 
limited one-name study and ancestors of my sons from two different marriages.  
I'd be completely overwhelmed by now if I'd tried to separate them into 
different databases.  There are very easy ways to pull different lines from a 
single Legacy database, but merging separate files can be troublesome.  And 
what do you do when you come across your immigrant ancestor's roots in Europe?  
You'd have to enter all of the data three times.  Stick with one file.

Kirsten




Legacy User Group guidelines: 
   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages: 
   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyfamilytree.com/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Reply via email to