Syble, I too feel a little cheated with all the build up to the new update but 'don't throw the baby out with the bathwater'. Legacy is still the best family history program I have ever used in my 15 years of doing it.
Ron, I did update the software as soon as it became available, loaded the nFS module thingy to check it out then felt completely frustrated that I couldn't use it. I think Syble is right, it shouldn't have been incorporated unless it was useable. I guess you can't please everybody, but this sucks! Regards Norman On 2 February 2010 06:00, Syble Glasscock <[email protected]> wrote: > > I'm very disappointed in this new update, if they wanted to go this route, > the least they could do is give those of us that are not LDS a way to opt out > of it, and have only an update for fixing any bugs. I really do appreciate > all the help this group has given me, a special thanks to you Ron, but guess > I'll be looking for new software. > Syble Glasscock > > --- On Mon, 2/1/10, Ron Ferguson <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Norman, > > Whether you update or not is your choice, but a number of bugs have also > been sorted. I am not LDS either (and I do transcription for them) but I > consider the update worth installing. > > Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
