Hi there Thankyou to Dennis and the Bain family. I think you have hit the nail on the head. I have events for all the census years, where I can and out of the 3863 in my search 131 had still got the 1911 date in them. I shall take heed and do the tag and search and see if it improves the situation.
Ta for that Gwen On 6/08/2010, at 12:39 PM, Dennis M. Kowallek wrote: > This problem pops up at least once a year on the LUG. > > If you have an individual with 2 events, one event WITH a 1911 date > and > one event WITHOUT, what happens when you tell Legacy to list > individuals > WITHOUT a 1911 date? It will list this individual because at least one > of the dates WAS NOT 1911. > > So if you really want to find individuals WITHOUT any 1911 events, you > should first tag everyone in your database. Then search for > individuals > WITH a 1911 event. Then UNTAG these individuals. The tagged > individuals > that are left are those WITHOUT any 1911 events. > > Confused yet? Maybe someone else can do better with this explanation. > > -- > > Dennis Kowallek (LTools) > http://zippersoftware.com/ltools > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ltools > > *** > > On Thu, 5 Aug 2010 16:46:56 -0700, "Bain Family" <rlcb...@gotsky.com> > wrote: > >> Of the 1911 Census people who were improperly included, have you >> checked >> them to be sure their 1911 date is in the date section and not in the >> description section? I've had almost the identical problem all >> because some >> of my dates ended up in the description section when I imported to >> Legacy. >> >> ~Lana >> >> >> >> -------------------------------------------------- >> From: "Noddie" <7thw...@ihug.co.nz> >> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 4:03 PM >> To: <LegacyUserGroup@LegacyUsers.com> >> Subject: [LegacyUG] Search for event details >> >>> Hi everyone >>> >>> I am hoping this has not been asked before. >>> I would like to make a list of individuals who do not have 1911 >>> census details in the events I have created. >>> >>> I did a search >>> Individual Event-date Not equal to 1911 >>> All ok I got a list of 3863 individuals >>> >>> I checked the info and found that some on the list had been included >>> even though their 1911 date had been filled in. >>> >>> I am a little nervous with this, as I am not sure now that the >>> search >>> is full proof, and wonder if I am doing it the >>> wrong way. It seems a little hit and miss to me? >>> >>> Thanks for your time >>> Regards >>> >>> Gwen > > > > Legacy User Group guidelines: > > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp > > Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ > > Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/ > > Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp > > To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp > > > Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
