On 07/04/2020 17:41, Chris Hill wrote:
My guess is that there is a 1841 census record (6 Jun 1841) on the
person whose marriage she was a witness to. I think that, logically, a
shared event is always tied back to the original event person rather
than the person it is shared to.
Potentially a programming error, but I suspect more likely a case
'we did not think about it'. If that is the case it would be a reason to
raise it as in issue.
That sounded like a very sound idea and I thought you might have cracked
it, but I changed the 1841 Census date on both of the wedding couple and
ran the Search again and STILL the wrong person (their witness) appeared
in the Search List.
--
Jenny M Benson - http://jennygenes.blogspot.co.uk/
Wrexham, UK
--
LegacyUserGroup mailing list
LegacyUserGroup@legacyusers.com
To manage your subscription and unsubscribe
http://legacyusers.com/mailman/listinfo/legacyusergroup_legacyusers.com
Archives at:
http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/
