On Mar 25, 2005, at 9:51 AM, Niclas Hedhman wrote:

On Friday 25 March 2005 21:18, Mario Ivankovits wrote:
What I would like to say is: Any company who knows how valuable all the
opensource work is would sign a CCLA.

That is somewhat related to the scope of the contract.

A CCLA covers an entire company, be that of NiclasHedhmanInc or CitiBank.
Legal scope is a risk issue, as is the length of the contract.

The CCLA requires individuals to be listed. It still keeps the burden of policing who contributes and what is contributed on the company. It just means they can't say "we had no idea..."


geir

--
Geir Magnusson Jr                                  +1-203-665-6437
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


--------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational only, are not privileged and do not constitute legal advice. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to