sward wrote: > By having a closed development process, and publishing drafts > for review, OSMF have forced the process to involve rounds > of consultation.
It's not OSMF's licence. It is a third-party licence which OSM is considering and on which OSMF has sponsored some work. To my knowledge Jordan has always been very willing to receive comments and suggestions. cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/23rd-Dec-board-meeting-tp21639674p21650895.html Sent from the OpenStreetMap - Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk