Hi, Russ Nelson wrote: > I was relying on information in this book. Feel free to disagree with > John Forester (elsewhere), but my point applies to any unlikely event > of bad consequences which can me mitigated at low cost.
"At low cost" is something that remains to be seen - with the initial version we have here, the "low cost" would serve to discourage any non-private users, force underage users to lie to us, and do all sorts of other ugly things which I personally consider quite a sell-out to legal scaremongers. The "cost" would be nothing less than losing face and admitting you do the same shit that everyone else does just because that's how the system works. I'd hope for this project to have the spine to resist putting up stupid legalese that everybody *must* ignore to stay sane. Bye Frederik _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
