Andy Allan wrote: > other than that you can change the criteria to make sure the result >> you want emerges at the end rather than based on rational arguments as >> you >> can now. > > That's quite an offensive accusation, and I hope it was aimed at me > rather than the LWG. >
It was not aimed at anyone particular, other than at human psychology. However, if I did offend someone, I would like to deeply apologise to them. Kai -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/License-Cut-over-and-critical-mass-tp5279719p5288873.html Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
