---- Original Message -----
From: "Frederik Ramm" <frede...@remote.org>
To: "Licensing and other legal discussions." <legal-talk@openstreetmap.org>
Sent: Monday, August 16, 2010 11:40 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Simple question about CT
Hi,
David Groom wrote:
However from a legal point of view the CT terms say is is an agreement
between "you" and OSMF.
Interesting, and probably true. But since making the second account forces
you to use a different email address, how will we ever know with certainty
that "you" and "you" are the same person?
We won't..
But just because we cant catch someone breaking the CT terms, doesn't mean
they aren't still breaking them :)
David
- Sometimes I wonder. We're joyfully ignoring the world before us in the
area of cartography, confessing to utter cluelessness in GIS affairs and
still doing great. Nobody has ever recommended employing professional GIS
consultants because, hey, "we're just geeks an programmers and they are
GIS experts". We're also self-taught in most other aspects of running OSM,
blissfully ignoring the professional world. Isn't it sad that when it
comes to "legal", we've meanwhile almost reached the point where we send
away 12-year-old mappers because they are not old enough to legally agree
to the CT? (Why don't we, by the way?) (Oh no, sorry, delete that last
question.)
Bye
Frederik
_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
