On 17/09/2010 21:42, John Smith wrote:
On 18 September 2010 06:36, Dave F.<dave...@madasafish.com> wrote:
*Not* as you think/assume/guess they might be in the future.
That's the problem, the CTs aren't specific enough to deal with future
changes, and this is one of the outstanding issues that makes them
incompatible with cc-by/attribution data:
1) My question was about the new license not cc-by. Your point should be
(& probably already has been) discussed in another thread.
2) My question was about how the new license/CT is worded *now* not in
the assumptive future.
I know it doesn't make for a good argumentative discussion, but I really
would like pain & simple facts. (Here's living in hope!)
Cheers
Dave F.
_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
