Messages by Date
-
2011/06/04
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Is mail address le...@osmfoundation.org valid?
Michael Collinson
-
2011/06/03
[OSM-legal-talk] Is mail address le...@osmfoundation.org valid?
Jukka Rahkonen
-
2011/05/31
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Recent spike in the CT acceptance graph
Tom Hughes
-
2011/05/31
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Recent spike in the CT acceptance graph
ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
-
2011/05/30
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Recent spike in the CT acceptance graph
Grant Slater
-
2011/05/30
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Recent spike in the CT acceptance graph
Eugene Alvin Villar
-
2011/05/30
[OSM-legal-talk] Recent spike in the CT acceptance graph
Eugene Alvin Villar
-
2011/05/26
[OSM-legal-talk] Import from Ushahidi Libya Instance
Mikel Maron
-
2011/05/18
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Copyright and License in WFS service
Jukka Rahkonen
-
2011/05/16
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license for "Wiki Loves Monuments"
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
-
2011/05/16
[OSM-legal-talk] Copyright and License in WFS service
Jukka Rahkonen
-
2011/05/15
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license for "Wiki Loves Monuments"
Mike Dupont
-
2011/05/15
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license for "Wiki Loves Monuments"
Frederik Ramm
-
2011/05/15
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license for
Ed Avis
-
2011/05/14
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license for "Wiki Loves Monuments"
Mike Dupont
-
2011/05/14
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license for "Wiki Loves Monuments"
andrzej zaborowski
-
2011/05/14
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license for "Wiki Loves Monuments"
Rob Myers
-
2011/05/14
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license for "Wiki Loves Monuments"
Mike Dupont
-
2011/05/14
[OSM-legal-talk] license for "Wiki Loves Monuments"
Kolossos
-
2011/05/14
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] 'Contents'
Ed Avis
-
2011/05/09
[OSM-legal-talk] VDOT data release statement
Josh Doe
-
2011/05/09
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Gent Thaçi wants to stay in touch on LinkedIn
Gent Thaçi
-
2011/05/08
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] 'Contents'
Francis Davey
-
2011/05/08
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] 'Contents'
Ed Avis
-
2011/05/06
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [OSM-talk] Breaking up is hard to do (was New Logo in the Wiki)
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
-
2011/05/06
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [OSM-talk] Breaking up is hard to do (was New Logo in the Wiki)
Russ Nelson
-
2011/05/06
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] 'Contents'
Francis Davey
-
2011/05/06
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [OSM-talk] Breaking up is hard to do (was New Logo in the Wiki)
John Smith
-
2011/05/06
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [OSM-talk] Breaking up is hard to do (was New Logo in the Wiki)
Frederik Ramm
-
2011/05/05
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [OSM-talk] Breaking up is hard to do (was New Logo in the Wiki)
John Smith
-
2011/05/05
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [OSM-talk] Breaking up is hard to do (was New Logo in the Wiki)
Russ Nelson
-
2011/05/04
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [OSM-talk] Breaking up is hard to do (was New Logo in the Wiki)
Frederik Ramm
-
2011/04/29
[OSM-legal-talk] Review of Articles of Association - Request for legal counsel
Henk Hoff
-
2011/04/27
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] 'Contents'
Ed Avis
-
2011/04/27
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] 'Contents'
Francis Davey
-
2011/04/27
[OSM-legal-talk] 'Contents'
Ed Avis
-
2011/04/19
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Rights granted to OSMF (Section 2 of the CT)
Rob Myers
-
2011/04/19
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Rights granted to OSMF (Section 2 of the CT)
Richard Fairhurst
-
2011/04/19
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Rights granted to OSMF (Section 2 of the CT)
ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
-
2011/04/19
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Are CT contributors are in breach of the CC-BY-SA license?
Francis Davey
-
2011/04/18
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Rights granted to OSMF (Section 2 of the CT)
Rob Myers
-
2011/04/18
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Rights granted to OSMF (Section 2 of the CT)
Simon Ward
-
2011/04/18
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Rights granted to OSMF (Section 2 of the CT)
Rob Myers
-
2011/04/18
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Rights granted to OSMF (Section 2 of the CT)
Simon Ward
-
2011/04/18
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Are CT contributors are in breach of the CC-BY-SA license?
Francis Davey
-
2011/04/18
[OSM-legal-talk] Contributor terms: errors in the Italian translation
Niccolo Rigacci
-
2011/04/18
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Are CT contributors are in breach of the CC-BY-SA license?
Francis Davey
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Rights granted to OSMF (Section 2 of the CT)
andrzej zaborowski
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Rights granted to OSMF (Section 2 of the CT)
ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Are CT contributors are in breach of the CC-BY-SA license?
80n
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Rights granted to OSMF (Section 2 of the CT)
Grant Slater
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Mixing data under different licenses
Frederik Ramm
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Are CT contributors are in breach of the CC-BY-SA license?
Francis Davey
-
2011/04/17
[OSM-legal-talk] Mixing data under different licenses
Eldad Yamin
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Are CT contributors are in breach of the CC-BY-SA license?
80n
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Rights granted to OSMF (Section 2 of the CT)
ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Are CT contributors are in breach of the CC-BY-SA license?
Francis Davey
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Are CT contributors are in breach of the CC-BY-SA license?
Grant Slater
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Are CT contributors are in breach of the CC-BY-SA license?
80n
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Rights granted to OSMF (Section 2 of the CT)
Rob Myers
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Rights granted to OSMF (Section 2 of the CT)
ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Rights granted to OSMF (Section 2 of the CT)
ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Rights granted to OSMF (Section 2 of the CT)
ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Are CT contributors are in breach of the CC-BY-SA license?
Francis Davey
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Are CT contributors are in breach of the CC-BY-SA license?
Rob Myers
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Are CT contributors are in breach of the CC-BY-SA license?
Francis Davey
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Rights granted to OSMF (Section 2 of the CT)
Simon Poole
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Rights granted to OSMF (Section 2 of the CT)
Francis Davey
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Rights granted to OSMF (Section 2 of the CT)
Michael Collinson
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Are CT contributors are in breach of the CC-BY-SA license?
80n
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Rights granted to OSMF (Section 2 of the CT)
ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Rights granted to OSMF (Section 2 of the CT)
ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Are CT contributors are in breach of the CC-BY-SA license?
Francis Davey
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Rights granted to OSMF (Section 2 of the CT)
Francis Davey
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Are CT contributors are in breach of the CC-BY-SA license?
andrzej zaborowski
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Are CT contributors are in breach of the CC-BY-SA license?
80n
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Are CT contributors are in breach of the CC-BY-SA license?
Eugene Alvin Villar
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Rights granted to OSMF (Section 2 of the CT)
Simon Poole
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Rights granted to OSMF (Section 2 of the CT)
Simon Poole
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Rights granted to OSMF (Section 2 of the CT)
80n
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Are CT contributors are in breach of the CC-BY-SA license?
80n
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Rights granted to OSMF (Section 2 of the CT)
Frederik Ramm
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Rights granted to OSMF (Section 2 of the CT)
Eugene Alvin Villar
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Are CT contributors are in breach of the CC-BY-SA license?
80n
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Rights granted to OSMF (Section 2 of the CT)
ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Are CT contributors are in breach of the CC-BY-SA license?
Eugene Alvin Villar
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Rights granted to OSMF (Section 2 of the CT)
ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Rights granted to OSMF (Section 2 of the CT)
Frederik Ramm
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Are CT contributors are in breach of the CC-BY-SA license?
John Smith
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Rights granted to OSMF (Section 2 of the CT)
Rob Myers
-
2011/04/17
[OSM-legal-talk] Are CT contributors are in breach of the CC-BY-SA license?
80n
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Rights granted to OSMF (Section 2 of the CT)
Florian Lohoff
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Rights granted to OSMF (Section 2 of the CT)
Eugene Alvin Villar
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Rights granted to OSMF (Section 2 of the CT)
Florian Lohoff
-
2011/04/17
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] A legal question
Eldad Yamin
-
2011/04/16
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Rights granted to OSMF (Section 2 of the CT)
Eugene Alvin Villar
-
2011/04/16
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Rights granted to OSMF (Section 2 of the CT)
John Smith
-
2011/04/16
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Rights granted to OSMF (Section 2 of the CT)
Eugene Alvin Villar
-
2011/04/16
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Rights granted to OSMF (Section 2 of the CT)
John Smith
-
2011/04/16
[OSM-legal-talk] Rights granted to OSMF (Section 2 of the CT)
Eugene Alvin Villar
-
2011/04/16
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] A legal question
Simon Biber
-
2011/04/16
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] A legal question
Eldad Yamin
-
2011/04/16
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] A legal question
Michael Collinson
-
2011/04/16
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] A legal question
Simon Biber
-
2011/04/16
[OSM-legal-talk] A legal question
Eldad Yamin
-
2011/04/15
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins Sunday
Frederik Ramm
-
2011/04/15
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins Sunday
Francis Davey
-
2011/04/15
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [OSM-talk] OpenStreetMap License Change Phase 3 begins Sunday
Frederik Ramm
-
2011/04/14
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Questions about CTs 1.2.4
Frederik Ramm
-
2011/04/14
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Questions about CTs 1.2.4
David Groom
-
2011/04/14
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Questions about CTs 1.2.4
Francis Davey
-
2011/04/14
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Questions about CTs 1.2.4
Robert Whittaker (OSM)
-
2011/04/14
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Questions about CTs 1.2.4
Francis Davey
-
2011/04/14
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Acceptable licences and splitting account edits
Robert Whittaker (OSM)
-
2011/04/14
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Acceptable licences and splitting account edits
Ed Avis
-
2011/04/14
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Questions about CTs 1.2.4
Robert Whittaker (OSM)
-
2011/04/13
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Questions about CTs 1.2.4
Francis Davey
-
2011/04/13
[OSM-legal-talk] Questions about CTs 1.2.4
James Livingston
-
2011/04/13
[OSM-legal-talk] Acceptable licences and splitting account edits
James Livingston
-
2011/04/11
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] definitions of "free" and "open"
Francis Davey
-
2011/04/11
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] definitions of "free" and "open"
Grant Slater
-
2011/04/11
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] definitions of "free" and "open"
Francis Davey
-
2011/04/10
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CT, time period for reply to a new license change (active contributor)
James Livingston
-
2011/04/09
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Compliance timeline
Eugene Alvin Villar
-
2011/04/09
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [OSM-talk] Announcement: "Add-tags" a tool to connect OpenStreetMap & Wikipedia
Kolossos
-
2011/04/09
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [OSM-talk] Announcement: "Add-tags" a tool to connect OpenStreetMap & Wikipedia
Frederik Ramm
-
2011/04/09
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Compliance timeline
Ed Avis
-
2011/04/08
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Compliance timeline
Simon Poole
-
2011/04/08
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Compliance timeline
Francis Davey
-
2011/04/08
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Compliance timeline
Ed Avis
-
2011/04/08
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Compliance timeline
Simon Poole
-
2011/04/08
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Compliance timeline
Ed Avis
-
2011/04/08
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Compliance timeline
Frederik Ramm
-
2011/04/08
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Compliance timeline
80n
-
2011/04/08
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Compliance timeline
Ed Avis
-
2011/04/08
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CT, time period for reply to a new license change (active contributor)
Richard Weait
-
2011/04/08
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Compliance timeline
Eugene Alvin Villar
-
2011/04/08
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Compliance timeline
Frederik Ramm
-
2011/04/08
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Compliance timeline
Ed Avis
-
2011/04/08
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Compliance timeline
Kevin Peat
-
2011/04/08
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CT, time period for reply to a new license change (active contributor)
Ed Avis
-
2011/04/08
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Compliance timeline
John Smith
-
2011/04/08
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Compliance timeline
Nick Hocking
-
2011/04/08
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Compliance timeline
Rob Myers
-
2011/04/08
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Compliance timeline
John Smith
-
2011/04/07
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Compliance timeline
Ed Avis
-
2011/04/07
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CT, time period for reply to a new license change (active contributor)
Michael Collinson
-
2011/04/07
[OSM-legal-talk] Compliance timeline
Nick Hocking
-
2011/03/30
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] RAND Corporation license violation
Grant Slater
-
2011/03/30
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] RAND Corporation license violation
Julio Costa Zambelli
-
2011/03/30
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] RAND Corporation license violation
Julio Costa Zambelli
-
2011/03/30
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] RAND Corporation license violation
Richard Weait
-
2011/03/30
[OSM-legal-talk] RAND Corporation license violation
Julio Costa Zambelli
-
2011/03/27
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CT, time period for reply to a new license change (active contributor)
Richard Weait
-
2011/03/27
[OSM-legal-talk] CT, time period for reply to a new license change (active contributor)
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
-
2011/03/24
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Request for clarification (for German translation) of CTs 1.2.4
Rob Myers
-
2011/03/24
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Request for clarification (for German translation) of CTs 1.2.4
Simon Poole
-
2011/03/24
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Request for clarification (for German translation) of CTs 1.2.4
Simon Poole
-
2011/03/24
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Request for clarification (for German translation) of CTs 1.2.4
Nakor
-
2011/03/24
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Request for clarification (for German translation) of CTs 1.2.4
Francis Davey
-
2011/03/24
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Request for clarification (for German translation) of CTs 1.2.4
Francis Davey
-
2011/03/24
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Request for clarification (for German translation) of CTs 1.2.4
Richard Fairhurst
-
2011/03/24
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Request for clarification (for German translation) of CTs 1.2.4
Richard Fairhurst
-
2011/03/24
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Request for clarification (for German translation) of CTs 1.2.4
Francis Davey
-
2011/03/24
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Request for clarification (for German translation) of CTs 1.2.4
Richard Fairhurst
-
2011/03/24
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] [OSM-talk] Licensing Working Group
Frederik Ramm
-
2011/03/24
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Request for clarification (for German translation) of CTs 1.2.4
Francis Davey
-
2011/03/24
[OSM-legal-talk] Request for clarification (for German translation) of CTs 1.2.4
Simon Poole
-
2011/03/21
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Someone ought to do something ... dealing with violations of OSM's geodata license
Rob Myers
-
2011/03/21
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Someone ought to do something ... dealing with violations of OSM's geodata license
ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
-
2011/03/21
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Someone ought to do something ... dealing with violations of OSM's geodata license
Frederik Ramm
-
2011/03/21
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Someone ought to do something ... dealing with violations of OSM's geodata license
Francis Davey
-
2011/03/20
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Someone ought to do something ... dealing with violations of OSM's geodata license
Frederik Ramm
-
2011/03/20
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Someone ought to do something ... dealing with violations of OSM's geodata license
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
-
2011/03/20
[OSM-legal-talk] Someone ought to do something ... dealing with violations of OSM's geodata license
Michael Collinson
-
2011/03/11
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] ODbL / CT and CC-BY-SA Pictures / Texts / Video
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
-
2011/03/11
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] ODbL / CT and CC-BY-SA Pictures / Texts / Video
Richard Weait
-
2011/03/11
[OSM-legal-talk] ODbL / CT and CC-BY-SA Pictures / Texts / Video
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
-
2011/03/05
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] US Rails to Trails database
Russ Nelson
-
2011/03/05
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] odbl
Mike N
-
2011/03/04
[OSM-legal-talk] Does routing based on OSM data lead to a derived or assembled work?
mg040
-
2011/02/16
[OSM-legal-talk] Phase 4 -[erroneously was OpenStreetMap copyright credits]
David Groom
-
2011/02/16
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OpenStreetMap copyright credits
Frederik Ramm
-
2011/02/16
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] OpenStreetMap copyright credits
David Groom
-
2011/02/14
[OSM-legal-talk] OpenStreetMap copyright credits
Tobias Wendorff
-
2011/02/10
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Fwd: mapquest open aerial tiles
Emilie Laffray
-
2011/02/06
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Contributor Terms upgrade ready
Olaf Schmidt-Wischhöfer
-
2011/02/04
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] question
Frederik Ramm
-
2011/02/04
[OSM-legal-talk] question
Irakli
-
2011/02/03
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CC-BY-SA / Non-separatable combination of OSM+other
Anthony
-
2011/02/03
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CC-BY-SA / Non-separatable combination of OSM+other
Anthony
-
2011/02/03
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CC-BY-SA / Non-separatable combination of OSM+other
Anthony
-
2011/02/03
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CC-BY-SA / Non-separatable combination of OSM+other
Rob Myers
-
2011/02/03
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CC-BY-SA / Non-separatable combination of OSM+other
Jonathan Harley
-
2011/02/03
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CC-BY-SA / Non-separatable combination of OSM+other
Jonathan Harley
-
2011/02/03
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CC-BY-SA / Non-separatable combination of OSM+other
Richard Fairhurst
-
2011/02/03
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CC-BY-SA / Non-separatable combination of OSM+other
Jonathan Harley
-
2011/02/02
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CC-BY-SA / Non-separatable combination of OSM+other
Anthony
-
2011/02/02
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CC-BY-SA / Non-separatable combination of OSM+other
Anthony
-
2011/02/02
Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CC-BY-SA / Non-separatable combination of OSM+other
Anthony