80n wrote: > You are not free to ignore the share-alike clause. You are simply avoiding > it by not publishing the combined work.
The ever-unreliable dictionary on this Mac defines publish as "print (something) in a book or journal so as to make it generally known: we pay $10 for every letter we publish". You certainly are making the combined work known, and insofar as "print" can be interpreted as "displayed on a monitor" (you'd have thought Apple would ship a dictionary on their Macs that was written some time in the last 50 years), it's spot on. Take the example at http://www.geowiki.com/halcyon/ : the combined work is OSM data (CC-BY-SA) and a map stylesheet. _But_ the map stylesheet does not have to be licensed as CC-BY-SA because the client (in this case, a Flash app) is doing the combining. > That's a feature of CC-BY-SA which > can be used for the scenario you describe. Yeah, I like features. Potlatch has about 300 features listed on trac. I might get round to fixing them one of these days. cheers Richard -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/OSM-legal-talk-Share-alike-tp5750998p5751217.html Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
