I'd like to link to a recent interesting article on the OSM licensing change
on LWN (Linux Weekly News) as I haven't seen it be mentioned anywhere yet.

http://lwn.net/Articles/422493/

It also has a 60 entry long comment section. Although much is a rehash of
the the endless debates on OSMs own communication channels,
there are also a set of comments by user mlinksva from Creative Commons
(e.g. http://lwn.net/Articles/422754/) that seem to bring points to light
that would suggest a possible, quite significant, change of attitude (or at
least a perceived change) of CC towards open data licensing and OSM.

I'll try and paraphrase some of the main points and hope I don't
missrepresent anyone.

- CC does not (no longer) think data should be PD and would be happy with
copyleft on data. The statements of CC saying data should be PD were from
science commons for scientific data only and was a misscommunication that it
was perceived as general CC viewpoint

- CC does care about data and either sees their licensing as potentially
valid for data or intend to make it work for data

- CC is (or will be) working on a new version 4 of their CC licenses, which
will apparently make every effort to address the needs of the open data
ecosystem

What exactly this all means, if it is indeed a shift away from the position
CC appears to have held previously, why it comes to light now and if it has
any relevance to the license change process for OSM I have no idea. But
perhaps we will find out more about this soon from CC as mlinksva mentioned
he wanted to follow up on these points publicly.

Their wiki page on version 4 ( http://wiki.creativecommons.org/Version_4 )
at least is still entirely empty. So it probably isn't anything around the
corner or of any certainty yet.

Kai
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/LWN-article-on-license-change-and-Creative-Commons-tp5945925p5945925.html
Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

Reply via email to