On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 5:03 AM, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> wrote: > I think that the misconception from which CC is now distancing themselves is > that "data should be licensed CC0", not "OSM is a databae of facts".
Do you think they are also distancing themselves from the position that scientific data should be licensed CC0? Mike's comments seemed to imply that they were sticking by that, and I find it hard to see how cartographic facts are not scientific data. _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
