----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard Fairhurst" <rich...@systemed.net>
To: <legal-talk@openstreetmap.org>
Sent: Friday, July 01, 2011 10:19 AM
Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Exception in OpenDataLicense/Community
Guidelines for temporary file
David Groom wrote:
We also have be mindful of the OSM guideline of substantial [1], which
seems to indicate that only very small extracts counts as insubstantial.
I think the thing about these guidelines is that they are meant to be
Community Guidelines: "here's what the OSM community expects of data
users".
We are the OSM community. We're discussing this for the first time. It is,
really, up to us to write the guidelines. Should we have one on access to
derivative databases?
We could do, but then IMHO we run the risk of the sort of problems I was
asking a week or so ago in
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/2011-June/006293.html
Regards
David
cheers
Richard
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/Exception-in-Open-Data-License-Community-Guidelines-for-temporary-file-tp6504201p6537003.html
Sent from the Legal Talk mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
