> From: Stephan Knauss [mailto:o...@stephans-server.de] > Subject: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] Imagery license clarification needed > > Not understanding what the definition of LIDP is makes it so difficult > for me to understand the license. > Martin replied earlier and he did interpret it as not suitable for OSM.
You can't really interpret part of a license. LIDP is probably a term defined elsewhere. I doubt a tracing is a LIDP, on the other hand, I don't see permission for non-literal imagery derived products (IDPs). > > Can you provide the full license so that we can see what the classify > > tracings as? > Unfortunately that was all license text available. It comes from HOT > context. I noticed that a lot of imagery and data available for that > humanitarian context comes with a clear non-commercial clause. I checked the HOT tasking manager and the license presented to users can be found at http://tasks.hotosm.org/license/1 (OSM OAuth signin required) but the usage terms refer to the "NextView (NV) License)" and it's not clear if that's the same as the usage terms. I've cc'ed hot@ because they should be able clear up these confusions. _______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
