The LWG has 3 US based legal professionals on it, no need for me to climb out on a limb :-). I'll ask for an opinion internally and get back to you.
Simon Am 23.01.2017 um 23:23 schrieb Blake Girardot HOT/OSM: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2017 at 10:37 PM, Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch> wrote: >> Blake where is the imagery provider in question based? >> > United States > > Cheers > blake > > >> Simon >> >> >> Am 23.01.2017 um 22:01 schrieb Blake Girardot HOT/OSM: >>> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Simon Poole <si...@poole.ch> wrote: >>>> In any case, getting permission to distribute on ODbL terms only would >>>> seem to be suboptimal and endangers any contributions based on so >>>> licensed material as any license change, even in name only, would cause >>>> issues that require going back to the licensor. >>>> >>> Simon, can you give an example of language you think would be best for this? >>> >>> Something like: >>> >>> "Specific permission is granted to use this imagery for digitizing >>> data into OpenStreetMap and the resulting OpenStreetMap data to be be >>> released under the OSM project's license of choice." >>> >>> Is that what you have in mind? >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Blake >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------- >>> Blake Girardot >>> Humanitarian OpenStreetMap Team, TM3 Project Manager >>> skype: jblakegirardot >>> HOT Core Team Contact: i...@hotosm.org >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> legal-talk mailing list >>> legal-talk@openstreetmap.org >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> legal-talk mailing list >> legal-talk@openstreetmap.org >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk >> > >
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
