I've pointed this our before. but anyway: we don't really care that much
about the imagery licence as such as long as we are allowed to display
it in the usual OSM tools. The real question are the rights in digitized
vector data from that imagery.

The best situation IMHO is if the provider of the imagery clearly states
that they waive any rights in such digitized data (which depending on
jurisdiction they might not have in any case).

If they insist that the digitized data is a derivative and licensed on
the same terms as the imagery itself*, we need either explicit
permission roughly along the lines of the contributor terms (while
theoretically permission to distribute on ODbL 1.0 terms is enough, that
implies that the data may have to be removed on any licence change, a
lot of work that we probably don't want to have looming over us), or we
need waivers on specific incompatible terms of the licence. The later
requires that we determine exactly what needs to waived, something that
we (aka LWG) haven't done for CC BY-NC in any version.

Simon

* this is naturally just one of many variants possible, but likely the
most common. Commercial imagery typically has terms of use that cover
digitizing and needs to be considered separately.

Am 21.01.2017 um 03:10 schrieb Blake Girardot HOT/OSM:
> Greetings,
>
> We are working with an imagery provider who is going to release some
> of their imagery under cc-by-nc 4.0, and with a specific allowance for
> it to be used for digitizing into OSM.
>
> Their main goal as I understand it, is to make sure their imagery is
> cc-by-nc 4.0, but they are fine if it is digitized into OSM, knowing
> full well the digitized data is released under ODbL 1.0 and
> understanding how OSM provides attribution.
>
> Does anyone see any problem with this, or have specific suggestions to
> make sure their OSM specific allowance is clear enough?
>
> Cheers
> blake
>


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

Reply via email to