On Friday 20 December 2019, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
>
> Obviously, both nodes, ways and
> relations should be counted.
>
> Otherwise one would be able to
> temporarily create one relation,
> that would include all data (s)he
> wish to use and export this.

The "100 Features" limit as a rule of thumb for substantiality was not
really well thought through.  IMO a data volume limit would make more
sense - which would probably make sense to position somewhere between
1kB (approximately equivalent to a hundred untagged nodes) and 5kB
(addresses, buildings etc.)  Talking about compact binary data
representation here of course, not raw OSM XML and no lossy
compression.

--
Christoph Hormann
http://www.imagico.de/

_______________________________________________
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk

Reply via email to