sent from a phone
> On 23. Sep 2020, at 14:43, Kathleen Lu via legal-talk > <legal-talk@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > So if changeset comments did not count as part of the geo-database, OSM would > not have rights to use them, which would be contrary to the purposes of the > Contributor Terms. looking at the terms, to my layman’s view it seems unnecessary to qualify the term “contents of the OpenStreetMap project” with the limitation to geo-database. The whole sentence reads: “ Thank you for your interest in contributing data and/or any other content (collectively, “Contents”) to the geo-database of the OpenStreetMap project (the “Project”).” why not remove “geo-database of the”? If someone added the geo-database, maybe they wanted to exclude other databases or parts of the project? Are there terms for diary posts? Are diary posts distributed under the ODbL? Cheers Martin
_______________________________________________ legal-talk mailing list legal-talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
