On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 9:51 AM Neal Gompa <[email protected]> wrote:
> > >> - Do you have any advice on how to handle *tiny-keccak*'s license? >> >> > Ask the upstream to change to a suitable alternative? Usually I suggest > MIT instead. If they accept the change, then you can pull that back into > Fedora. > Working on that. It's a cryptographic library though - is there any impact on how we view licensing given a work of that nature? ~m
-- _______________________________________________ legal mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected] Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
