On Fri, Jan 16, 2026 at 7:19 AM Rodolfo Olivieri <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hi, folks!
>
> Looking at the dependency tree of Goose, I saw that they were pulling a
> package that was not needed for their application, thus, pulling
> *tiny-keccak* as part of it. I just disabled the default-features for
> that single dependency and now *tiny-keccak *is not present anymore 🎉
>
> Still, regarding *constant_time_eq*, if my understanding is correct,
> since it's multi-licensed we are fine in this case?
>

Yes, just make sure to omit CC0-1.0 as a choice for code. If non-code stuff
is CC0, then the license is still valid and must be identified.

I do recommend that you package the dependencies individually though,
otherwise it's going to be messy when it comes to auditing, fixing, and
upgrading dependencies.

-- 
真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!
-- 
_______________________________________________
legal mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[email protected]
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to