On Sat, 31 Aug 2013 09:08:30 -0400, SonWon wrote in message <cafv4+zwamzcjk54kfukmv+zm+4e35hfxr_+u+ussqeiagl0...@mail.gmail.com>:
> On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Arnt Karlsen <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > <snip> > > > > > > ..only if said .gov entity want's to distribute said GPL code > > on to e.g other .gov entities, employees etc "other people." > > for strictly internal use in .gov entity with no distribution > > to the outside and not for employee home use etc, there is no > > distribution. > > > > -- > > ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen > > ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... > > Scenarios always come in sets of three: > > best case, worst case, and just in case. > > > "home use" is a broad term ..correct, is why I said "employee home use" in this current context of ".gov employee home use". ;o) > and I am not convince just because a user uses it at home that it was > distributed. ..disagreed, and I think we're done discussing "Chad's Defense" here. ;o) > Take for example that this is a laptop used at work and at home, no > distribution from my point of view. ..disagreed, it crosses property borders and can be locked behind doors and can be kept in custody. ;o) > Perhaps it is a PC given to the user for his home office, still not > distribution the way I understand. ..disagreed, it crossed property borders and is behind locked doors and is kept in custody. ;o) > Perhaps it is given to the user for testing purposes, ..disagreed by default here now ;o), depends on what is meant by "given" and on the purpose of the testing, e.g. GPL compliance and .gov employee integrity. ;o) > not distribution ..disagreed. ;o) > however I think there are differing opinions here. ..surprise, from here onwards, I agree. ;o) > Outside of this I think we all could agree that there was a > distribution. > > Just my two sense. -- ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... Scenarios always come in sets of three: best case, worst case, and just in case.
