On Sep 3, 2013 4:57 AM, "Arnt Karlsen" <[email protected]> wrote:> > On Sat, 31 Aug 2013 09:08:30 -0400, SonWon wrote in message > <cafv4+zwamzcjk54kfukmv+zm+4e35hfxr_+u+ussqeiagl0...@mail.gmail.com>: > > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Arnt Karlsen <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > "home use" is a broad term > > ..correct, is why I said "employee home use" in this > current context of ".gov employee home use". ;o)
And it's all about ownership of where it's running. I can't use a license from my employer on my pc whose primary use is for personal use. > > and I am not convince just because a user uses it at home that it was > > distributed. > > ..disagreed, and I think we're done discussing > "Chad's Defense" here. ;o) +1. > > Take for example that this is a laptop used at work and at home, no > > distribution from my point of view. > > ..disagreed, it crosses property borders and can be locked behind > doors and can be kept in custody. ;o) An employer cannot use a personal device for business purposes without transfering that software, in terms of a right to use, to that employee. Also known as distribute it. > > Perhaps it is a PC given to the user for his home office, still not > > distribution the way I understand. > > ..disagreed, it crossed property borders and is behind locked doors > and is kept in custody. ;o) Actually he's right BUT the hardware is physically owned by the employer. > > Perhaps it is given to the user for testing purposes, > > ..disagreed by default here now ;o), depends on what is meant by > "given" and on the purpose of the testing, e.g. GPL compliance > and .gov employee integrity. ;o) Give. Huge hint. Lol. > > not distribution > > ..disagreed. ;o) > > > however I think there are differing opinions here. > > ..surprise, from here onwards, I agree. ;o) > > > Outside of this I think we all could agree that there was a > > distribution. > > > > Just my two sense. > > > > -- > ..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt Karlsen > ...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry... > Scenarios always come in sets of three: > best case, worst case, and just in case. >
