On Thu, 6 May 2010 09:35:18 -0500 >>>>>> "Edward" == "Edward K. Ream" wrote:
Edward> My question wasn't intended to start a debate about the relative Edward> merits of various source code control systems. Rather, I want Edward> to know whether I should be concerned, (or very very concerned) Edward> about the stability of bzr. Hmm, afaict, bzr has healthy community and it actively developed. If you have some specific problem with hosting Leo under bzr/LP, I think the best is to contact bzr devs who are usually very enthusiastic to help you resolve the problems and keep using bzr. Some time ago Emacs which is quite big project with long history has moved to bzr and I saw that some devs have some problem with it. Otoh, I quickly took a look at IPython list and saw there were some problems with corrupted repos. That's why I believe that Fossil is worthy to be tried since it is written by the guy who wrote SQlite and it is very robust system. It gives distributed VCS with autosync feature enabling to have sort of central-repo from/to where everyone pulls/push, integrated wiki and bugtracker...all of these is self-hosted on simple CGI-enabled server. Bzr is nice, but, imho, changed its repo format too many times...although they declared it won't happen in the future. Do you experience some specific bzr-related problem or just cautioned seeing IPython's migration? Sincerely, Gour -- Gour | Hlapicina, Croatia | GPG key: F96FF5F6 ----------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
