On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 10:17 AM, Ville M. Vainio <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Edward K. Ream <[email protected]> wrote: > >> My question wasn't intended to start a debate about the relative >> merits of various source code control systems. Rather, I want to know >> whether I should be concerned, (or very very concerned) about the >> stability of bzr. > > Frankly, I think you shouldn't. While the repo changes have caused > some annoyances (with zero data loss - basically just a little extra > work), bzr is still a good choice for a project the size of leo.
Thanks for this. Unless I hear something more ominous, I would prefer to stick with bzr. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor?hl=en.
