On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Jack Kuan <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks for your reply and for confirming the issue. I'll wait for Edward > to take a look. >
I have a good deal of sympathy for attempting organizations like this for languages like xml or html that lack proper functions, classes, methods, etc. However, you are asking a great deal of Leo's read code with such examples. I'm not greatly surprised that things don't work as intended. It fine with me if you file a bug report about this behavior, but I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for a fix. Ironically, the new @auto code may work better than @file in such situations. Or not. In particular, if two siblings are clones of each other, both will have exactly the same unl...In other cases, linking via unl's may actually work better than linking via gnx's. Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
