I'm actually using Leo for my (long) shell script. It's unfortunate that Leo does not allow me to freely organize my outline with clones... :( It's just something I thought Leo should be able to do from an user's point of view. Will the new @auto node be able to work with any type of source file?
Thanks Jack On Tuesday, January 14, 2014 12:06:54 PM UTC-5, Edward K. Ream wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Jack Kuan <[email protected] <javascript:> > > wrote: > >> Thanks for your reply and for confirming the issue. I'll wait for Edward >> to take a look. >> > > I have a good deal of sympathy for attempting organizations like this for > languages like xml or html that lack proper functions, classes, methods, > etc. > > However, you are asking a great deal of Leo's read code with such > examples. I'm not greatly surprised that things don't work as intended. > It fine with me if you file a bug report about this behavior, but I > wouldn't hold my breath waiting for a fix. > > Ironically, the new @auto code may work better than @file in such > situations. Or not. In particular, if two siblings are clones of each > other, both will have exactly the same unl...In other cases, linking via > unl's may actually work better than linking via gnx's. > > Edward > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/leo-editor. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
