On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 8:15 AM tbp1...@gmail.com <tbp100...@gmail.com> wrote:
Viktor, could you say more about the workflow you are thinking of? For > myself so far, I am happy to keep Leo open in its own app outside a > browser. And I would prefer to avoid running a server on my system to > mediate between Leo and the browser. However, without a server, it's not > really practical to store the Leo outlines on your computer in a way that > you can retrieve using other browsers or programs. A timely comment. Yesterday I spent several hours zooming with Félix getting leobridgeserver.py to work with a python test client. I'll write up the results later today. A client/server architecture is the only way to connect leoInteg (vs-code) to Leo's bridge. And leobridgeserver.py is completely agnostic about the language that clients use. Otoh, in the last few days it has become clear that I am not looking for anything better than python, or the desktop version of Leo, for that matter. In short, I am rapidly losing interest in the js world, except to support leoInteg. As #1810 <https://github.com/leo-editor/leo-editor/issues/1810> asserts, there is no particular need to make Leovue a full-featured editor. Suddenly lots of "spare time" has appeared. I'll think of something :-) Edward -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/CAMF8tS2Ay7CcRorOmMET06QE2bY8E-abX%2B2db5iagx_kupP52Q%40mail.gmail.com.
