Randy McMurchy wrote: > There is merit to the school of thought that the cross-lfs branch > is open for whatever changes as it is just a branch right now, and > doesn't necessarily need to be discussed here.
I initially shared those thoughts, but on reflection I do not buy into that argument at all. If Cross-lfs were ever to become the mainstream build then the early development of it needs to be part of the information trail. Regards Greg -- http://www.diy-linux.org/ -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
