Jim Gifford wrote:

> Randy McMurchy wrote:
>>
>>Seems like just a day or so ago Jim was saying that the book is now
>>ready for the wordsmiths.
>>
> It still is, but everyone seems to be interested in the next release of 
> LFS 6. So I made a change on my own, which is a positive change for the 
> book.

Say what? Jim, did you go and completely change the build method on your
own without even consulting Ryan? If this is true and I were Ryan I would
be mighty p'ed off. Hopefully Ryan will turn up here soon and will be
willing to debate the cross-lfs stuff because I now have some good
insights and constructive things to offer.

Jim, I don't know how to say this without sounding offensive, so please
accept my apologies in advance if I'm totally off the planet, but quite
frankly, I don't believe you have the necessary know-how to be making
fundamental changes to the cross build method.

After looking at your commit in detail, it's quite clear to me that you've
"borrowed" elements of my research when making these massive changes. I
don't mind you doing that, because it's a step in the right direction, but
could you please do the proper and ethical thing and at least give credit
where credit is due? I suspect Gerard and Matt will be rather unhappy if
their team members are participating in unethical practices. For the
record, I've learned a lot from studying Ryan's scripts and should I ever
produce some cross compilation documentation I will be acknowledging the
work in Cross-lfs, along with Crosstool, etc, etc, etc...

Regards
Greg
--
http://www.diy-linux.org/

-- 
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/
Unsubscribe: See the above information page

Reply via email to