On Die, 2005-07-26 at 09:52 +1000, Greg Schafer wrote: > For the record, here is what Jim changed: [...] snipped the "evidence" list > For the record, all of my cross research is available via mailing list > postings and scripts on the DIY website. It's there for anyone to see. The > anti-LFS sentiments I was experiencing at the time are evident but these > are now gone thanks to the sterling efforts of Matt. Just ignore the rants > and focus on the technical facts :-) > > Jim, the evidence is clear. Please, I urge you to do the ethical thing and > acknowledge you have used my research.
Do you think you're the only one able to understand some parts of cross-building a system? Your first post on diy-linux where you talk about cross compilation dates from May 27, 2005. I've committed a toolchain build instruction with gcc without-threads and without glibc-headers, -startfiles, and gcc-shared on May 3, 2005 to my experimental branch of paldo. So I could accuse you of using and not crediting my research but I don't as I know that it's likely that you did your research on your own. So please don't accuse other people of copying just because they got the same idea or did similar research. You're not the only one doing some research. BTW: I've asked Ryan why he didn't use the simpler build method and IIRC he replied that he wants to keep the compatibility with older toolchains that don't support the simpler method. Regards, Jürg -- Jürg Billeter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
