Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > So. I had been thinking it would be nice if LFS and BLFS adopted (some > of) this approach. Again, I fully recognize that this is new ground in a > way and that many people will think, "it is a hint and should stay a > hint", but, IMHO, there are many techniques employed here that a default > LFS user could learn from and benefit by.
+1 making it optional would be a good idea i think, as there are some people who do not like this proposal at all. by optional i mean, mentioning it at the beginning and make the instructions work with it, but not really using it (i do not know actually if there are still problems with the instructions in svn, but if there are it can not be a bad thing fixing them even if we do not use the hint). Anyway i would like to see the hint used in the main book. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
