On 7/9/06, Jim Gifford <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why not make CLFS the main LFS?
The two-stage build method has been proven and tested over years for the most popular arch, x86. I don't think it would be smart to throw that away yet. I have no problem increasing the visibility of CLFS as a viable option for the base system, but I'm not willing to abandon the two-stage build. It's been pretty quiet on LFS for a while, but I think with a release and some new activity getting the toolchain current, LFS will be just as relevant as ever. -- Dan -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
