david567 wrote these words on 08/15/07 11:45 CST: > Randy McMurchy wrote:
> Indeed, the book would need to be the implementation. My point exactly. You are suggesting a total implentation, where all we really need to do is explain *how* to implement if the reader wants. Not intrusive that way. Not doing a total implementation does however ruin cut-and-paste for folks that *do* want the framework. But I don't look at that as an issue, as we are not suggesting implementation of a PM, but just a framework for one of many, which means folks are customizing anyway. >> We've always worked with the underlying philosophy of "minimal". Said >> differently, "just enough to create a working bootable system". PM >> does not fall into that realm. >> > > Adding sustainable/upgradeable is not too far off the mark. To me, it is hundreds of miles off the mark. -- Randy rmlscsi: [bogomips 1003.26] [GNU ld version 2.16.1] [gcc (GCC) 4.0.3] [GNU C Library stable release version 2.3.6] [Linux 2.6.14.3 i686] 12:00:01 up 13 days, 11:51, 1 user, load average: 0.63, 0.29, 0.15 -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
