Jeremy Huntwork wrote: > On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 10:17:51AM -0700, lists wrote: >> If the editors pick a pm, then they are removing the "choice" part of that. > > And for that reason I think I would be against adding a specific PM to > LFS/BLFS. However, dropping in a DESTDIR framework would allow for > *most* package managers to be used without adding any further specifics.
Which is not an issue for me. setting it up as an environment variable as with $LFS but making it clear that this optional variable is only needed to make package manager usage easier to implement if they want seems a good resolution for LFS. > At this point, whether or not LFS or BLFS decide to use DESTDIR (or > anything else) isn't as important to me as getting the proper setup in > place for the LiveCD. :) Which would make maintaining the LiveCD far simpler for everyone involved. :) Since my involvment is limited to testing the LiveCD, not in maintaining it, whichever one works for the maintainers is the best option. ;) Jaqui -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/lfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/faq/ Unsubscribe: See the above information page
